Where do I began with Nancy? She is in trouble and does not seem to know it.
She reluctantly led the call to impeach President Trump the first time, but now, she jumped headlong into the disaster she has created for her life.
For those who took my analyzing the news class, will recognize the standard method of making the accusation without any actual fact:
NPR: "The rioters, spurred by Trump's repeated false claims that the election had been stolen from him, breached the Capitol, forcing lawmakers to temporarily abandon certifying President-elect Joe Biden's White House victory while party leadership was evacuated to safety."
NPR: "Trump had fomented the violent uprising, telling his supporters earlier in the day that they should walk to the Capitol to protest the election results."(Who uses the word fomented? This helps to give create a blame for President Trump without using red flag word like the actual definition: To arouse or incite.) If they used the word incite, you might ask, what did he say to incite them to "violent uprising."
What were Trumps actual words? Notice not quoted.
New York Times quoted the President, but before they said what he actually said, they described him, "Mr. Trump listened, and stewed and chastised Mr. Pence as soft. They described him as "furious with Mr. Pence." So now the reader has the correct picture of how they want the reader to see President Trump as "stewing, chastising and furious." They are now ready to see him as whipping the crowd into a frenzy as NYT writer wants us to see the President." After all the headline of this article is:
Trump Told Crowd ‘You Will Never Take Back Our Country With Weakness’
They went on to say, "he wanted the people gathered on the National Mall to go to the Capitol immediately afterward in protest of what he falsely claimed was a stolen election."
Notice they interjected their opinion as if it was a fact! "He falsely claimed" We will cover if it was a false claim later on.
Calling the outcome of the election “this egregious assault on our democracy,” he said his supporters should “walk down to the Capitol.” “We are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women,” he continued, “and we are probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them — because you will never take back our country with weakness.”
NYT did quote President Trump, but these are the words that were supposed to be what incited a riot.
Supporters should "walk down to the Capitol."
Walk down to the Capitol. He did not say storm the capitol, or take over the capital. He said walk down to the Capitol. That does not sound like riot inflaming words.
Once they walk down to the Capitol, what should they do? Burn those SOB's out? Push those commies out of our house? Suppress those aggressors? Start an uprising against the government? What should we do to show them!
"We are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women," Trump said.
Really?
Yes, he said, CHEER on our brave senators and congressman and women. Now those are real fighting words! Cheer them on. Ah but there is something different for those we don't like. Those, we should hang, fight be mean to, right? I mean they told us he incited the riot, inciting a riot is like working the people up to do violence, so what should we do to those we are not happy with?
"probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them," he said.
Not going to be cheering so much... he did not even see us booing them. He imagines not cheering so much. Wow, what violence! Not cheering so much.
Nancy Pelosi expressed her disapproval of what she was describing the President's administration to be doing that she felt was so outrageous that she was surprised as she put it " I just don't know why there aren't more uprisings all over the country, maybe there will be when the people realize that this is a policy that they defend. It is a horrible thing."
I did not want you to see just her words, I wanted you to hear the disappointment in her voice that no uprisings have occurred yet.
What is an uprising? By definition it is
up·ris·ing
1. A popular revolt against a government or its policies; a rebellion.
2. Insurrection
What is a revolt?
re·volt 1. To attempt to overthrow the authority of the state; rebel.
What is an insurrection?
in•sur•rec•tion
n.
an act or instance of rising in arms or open rebellion against an established government or authority.
So Nancy is surprised that there is not a rising in arms, an attempt to overthrow the authority, a rebellion against the government.
She is acting like the people should see the policy as horrible as she does, maybe then, they will start uprisings
She does not say that is bad and the proper thing for the people to do is to petition their government for grievances in protest. She actually says, "maybe there will be." That is inciting an insurrection. This is a policy that President Obama had in his administration and Nancy said nothing against it then and now she feels people should start uprisings.
But if President Trump says you should not be weak but cheer for the congressmen... you are happy with and do not so much cheering for the ones you are not so happy with, for that, Nancy led an impeachment against President Trump. She judged him wrongly but finds nothing wrong with her words which are looking for uprisings from the people!
It actually takes strong character to just be strong and cheer and not so much cheer!
Did you see anywhere in the news that President told the people that they will be marching over to the capital building?
He actually did, but that quote does not fit their picture of him hating the congressmen and women and the desire to show him as inciting a riot. Here is the actual quote:
“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capital building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard today. We will see whether republicans stand strong for integrity of our elections but whether or not they stand strong for our country.”
He called for the people to be peaceful. If you are asking the people to be peaceful and patriotic and make their voices heard, you are not asking them to riot!
New York Times described the stolen election as "falsely claimed."
But think, if suddenly several states stopped counting the votes, sent the democrats home, pulled out cases of ballots hidden under tables in the middle of the night and hundreds of thousands of votes started pouring in for President Trump and counties that sent out less ballots than were pouring in with 90% for President Trump, and mail in voting that had no signature requirements along with mail in votes that were against state election laws, all had ballots pouring in for President Trump that suddenly took away the 800,000 vote lead Joe Bidden had before all counting stopped and the next morning President Trump was ahead.
The media would be SCREAMING foul play! Stolen election! Not to mention voting machines that can switch votes based on percentages of votes coming, the entire landscape would be different!
Please pray for Nancy! I do not think she has the real understanding what she is doing to herself. Ever since a reporter asked her if she has a conflict of interest
Nancy said, "what my husband gets and what I get are two different things."
So according to her, there is no conflict of interest, I have been praying for her.
Conflict of interest over what?
President Obama wrote an executive order removing oil drilling in the gulf coast. There was a lot of suspicious events occurred up to the one off shore platform that caught fire which caused him to not allow the drilling but that part of the story is for a different discussion. This part is Nancy's part in the events. As chair of the congress she would not allow congress to vote on whether the executive order had over reached President Obama's authority and congress should allow the drilling to continue. Because she would not allow a vote, the drilling operations were closed and all those Americans lost their jobs. But to add insult to injury, Congress voted to give something like 4 million dollars to a Brazilian company to setup the drilling rigs, that had to be removed from the gulf coast, and were setup offshore of Brazil to benefit another nation from the drilling. So how did that benefit Nancy? Interesting, her husband sits on the board of the very Brazilian company that Congress gave the 4 million to set up their operations with drilling rigs removed from America to go off the coast of Brazil. She just explained that if her husband makes more money, it has NOTHING to do with her... no conflict of interest here, she declared.
This is what her boss says about her:
James 5:1-5 5 Come now, you rich people, weep and howl for your miseries which are coming upon you. 2 Your riches have rotted and your garments have become moth-eaten. 3 Your gold and your silver have corroded, and their corrosion will serve as a testimony against you and will consume your flesh like fire. It is in the last days that you have stored up your treasure! 4 Behold, the pay of the laborers who mowed your fields, and which has been withheld by you, cries out against you; and the outcry of those who did the harvesting has reached the ears of the Lord of armies. 5 You have lived for pleasure on the earth and lived luxuriously; you have fattened your hearts in a day of slaughter. 1 Tim 5:18 For the Scripture says, “You shall not muzzle the ox while it is threshing,” and “The laborer is worthy of his wages.” Those workers were worthy of their wages but... Nancy took away all the wages of those Americans to give the resources to another nation that she and her husband will profit from but God is angry at that type of treatment of people and she is blind to her actions! Her boss says: Nahum 1:3a (NASB) 3 The Lord is slow to anger and great in power, And the Lord will by no means leave the guilty unpunished. And says, Rev. 19:15 15 From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty.
Nancy does not show any knowledge of some VERY important things God promises, even though she says she was raised in a Catholic home.
Ezra 8:22b “The hand of our God is favorably disposed to all who seek Him, but His power and His anger are against all those who abandon Him.” It would do Nancy well to take to heart John Adam's concern when he said,
"The duration of future punishment terrifies me"
We need to pray for her. The decisions she is making is bringing her great wealth for now but are setting her up for great condemnation and punishment and that lasts for Eternity! Pray she will repent, for I am very scared for her!
Comentarios